Jewish holidays often make a poor fit with liberal pieties. Three of them end with mass bloodshed, not with reconciliation commissions, suggesting that life is a zero sum game and that those who try to kill you, deserve what's coming to them. There is nothing vague or ephemeral about those holidays, they mark historical events and the constant presence of death as a reality in the lives of men and nations. They testify to a G-d of history who is less concerned with feelings and tolerance, than with justice and truth.
Some accuse Jews of being obsessed with the Holocaust. It would be more accurate to accuse of us being obsessed with Egyptian slavery, the Amalekite raids, the Philistines persecutions, the Babylonian holocaust, the Syrian-Greek repressions, the Roman holocausts and on and on for more pages of history than most would care to hear until we reach the present day.
The more liberal a Jew is, the less likely he is to celebrate the substance of his people's holidays as they conflict with his worldview and virtues. Moshe, the Maccabees and Mordechai don't seem like role models, not even if you rebrand them as community organizers and claim that they were fighting prejudice. There is something relentlessly bloody-minded about them. They walk through the corpses of their enemies with no regrets or apologetic winces. They don't seem to want to make the world a better place, all they really do is stand up for their own people in a regrettable show of tribalism that perpetuates the cycle of violence.
Take Purim which began when a narrow-minded fanatic refused to bow to the Grand Vizier of a multicultural empire. Jewish leaders hurriedly reassured him that this fanatic was in no way representative of their values of tolerance and appeasement. Hadn't they attended the feast where the sacred vessels of their own people were used to serve wine and spirits to the mob? Rather than anticipating the return to their land at the end of the prophesied 70 year period of exile, they had cheered the brutish tyrant and made Sushan, his capital, into their new holy city.
A handful of fools may have gone back to their land, which the empire had in the intervening period, repopulated with other peoples. Those peoples had managed to convince the king to deny them permission to set up any more settlements and rebuild the temple. One of those Zionist leaders, a descendant of two families of kings, Mordechai, who could trace his descent to King Saul and to the House of David, was still busy working on behalf of the return from exile. And he refused to humble himself before the ancient enemy of his people.
But certainly they, the local establishment, were not so foolish or intolerant as to insult the Grand Vizier who ruled over a sizable portion of the known world, who had the king's ear and designs on his throne. They were good citizens, they assured him, with no interest in any fantasies about the return to a promised land. That land was gone along with the other ten tribes.
Perhaps in ancient times some deity had liberated them from Egypt, but here in the modern present, it was the fall of the Babylonian Empire which had raised them up out of slavery and given them a place among the subject peoples of a new empire. In that exodus their people had been massacred by the ancestors of the Grand Vizier and the ancestor king of that Mordechai fellow had massacred the Vizier's people, for which they were naturally very sorry, but it was all water under the bridge now. This was a new era.
Except it wasn't a new era at all. It still isn't. The illusion of history is that every age brings with it the end of history, a new age whose awesome achievements break with the past and usher in a boundless future. And then the walls come crashing down and the new era of history ends up buried under the rubble of time.
And so the Jewish people, loosely break down into Jews and New Age Jews. The Jews wandered on their meandering course through history using ancient maps and concerning themselves with a past that modern people dismissed as myth and legend, more ancient than that story about Troy, and even more dubious.
The New Age Jews saw the coming of a new era of history, a bright and shining plateau that made all those old moldy beliefs completely irrelevant. History had ended and now a new age had begun. The age of Alexandria, the age of Sushan, the age of Berlin. How, in such a new age, could they be expected to take a few bygone fairy tales retold by barbarians seriously? Such things weren't for enlightened people who were witnessing the end of history.
History never ends. That is the lesson of the Holocaust, of Purim and of countless other horrifying intrusions of the old into the new. The shining new era that begins with grand public spectacles and displays of the power and might of an empire, ends with corpses and men and women fighting and running for their lives.
The old Jews know what the New Age Jews do not, that history has not ended, that the past is still with us and that it has sharp teeth. They know that Man has not changed, that his sophistication is still only a shell and that sooner or later the shell cracks. If it does not crack from within, then it is cracked from without. While the New Age Jews sneer at the Holocaust obsession, Jews know that the past in all its awful terrors is a map and that forgetting it carries a terrible price.
Those who feel time in their bones know the patterns of history, reading ages like constellations, can never lose themselves in one age or fall into the fallacy of a new era. They know that there is nothing new under the sun. Machines may come and go, but the world is a broken place because the hearts of men have not turned from their ways. And so they remember that every age carries within it the seeds of its ruin. They witness the ruin, climb out of the ashes and move on.
Liberal pieties embrace the new age, fixate on a final transformative era of history at the hands of messiahs who promise hope and change, who will uplift us and inspire us to make the world into a better place. Clergy who preach the cant of Tikkun Olam, whose climactic religious holiday of the year is Martin Luther King Day and who like Caliph Omar on witnessing the Library of Alexandria proclaim that if the bible contains liberal dogma then it is redundant and if it does not, it is heretical, cannot meaningfully cope with that history. Their religion has no room in it for all these chambers of history or for the bloody-minded men who stride through it, without saving the whales.
Purim, a holiday preceded by a fast kept by the men going into battle and their loved ones, is not about forgiving your enemies, progressive taxation or coming out of the closet. It is about survival. Not mere survival, but the skin of the teeth sense of how close we came, that moment of revelation which pulls back the curtains of the material world and reminds us of the impossibility of our survival under all the ordinary rules of the world that new ages are found on. It reminds us that behind the scenes of the brick and mortar, steel and steam world, is something else entirely. A force that breaks apart the towers of history, that saves us when we should have died, that has entrusted us with a mission. It reminds us of what the world is and reminds us of Itself and of what we are.
When
you stand on the edge of death, life is a revelation. It is not our
deaths under the Egyptian sun, the blades and bullets of a thousand
empires and kingdoms, or the ovens of Dachau that we are obsessed with.
It is that moment of survival. The revelation that even amid the horrors
of all that we have witnessed and the terrible things that we had to do
to survive, we have risen out of the ground, watched the flesh cover
our bones and stood alive again upon the earth. Every time we survive,
we are reminded of the fragility of the world and of our enemies who
wielding every power and trick, have failed to destroy us. Each time we
rise, we transcend the world, in confronting our dead, we confront our
immortality.It is not a purely joyous experience. The day of Purim is preceded by a day of fasting. Before the celebration comes a day of battle as the struggle to survive, the long decline into the abyss, the final desperate hours, suddenly give way to the upheaval of an impossible salvation. We remember the pain, the sense of the grave closing over us, the bodies lying everywhere, the certainty that we will be next. We accept the hopelessness of our situation and then we walk out of the grave and praising G-d, sit down to the feast.
This is Jewish history. It is an alien one to the New Age Jew who clings tightly to the new era and its rules, to its pieties and its mores, who scowls at the old ones for refusing to come and join the imperial festivities where the vessels of the temple are used to serve drinks and the mob toasts that the 70 years have come and gone, and still there is no chance of the Jews returning to their Jerusalem and reclaiming the lost history. "The past is the past," says the New Age Jew. "The past is the present is the future," says the Jew.
The feast of the New Age is the celebration of the end of history, a golden time when there is an unlimited bounty for all, where the wine and the free health care will never run out, where everyone will live together under one government in perfect brotherhood for all time. Many Jews are drawn to this feast, its golden vessels, its vast bounty and its glorious ideals. But then enters the Grand Vizier and some of them begin to frown for though he wears rich garments and speaks soothing words, he is a monster. They don't always know how they know it, but it is a nagging feeling that creeps into them that there is something rotten at the heart of this new age.
Most of them still bow to him, touching their heads to the floor, some even embrace him and celebrate his vision. They assure others that he is our friend, the only man who can realize the promise of this age, a wise and noble leader whose vision of change brings new hope. But one or two stay away from the feast and refuse to bow to him. Instead they look to Jerusalem, to where the battle between good and evil was once fought, and where it will be fought again. They know him for what he is.
The Grand Vizier knows that he must destroy them, must destroy them all, because they have seen through what he is, and they have seen through the shallow trappings of the golden age of fools. They know that there is more to the world than the might of men and the cornucopias of kings. They know that he is not all-powerful and when he looks at them, a scowl wrinkles his face, because he knows it too.
So
he casts a lot, random chance in a random world where chance is supreme
and the whim of every ruler outweighs the weight of history. The bills
are signed, the laws are passed, the decrees go out, the officers from
the vast imperial bureaucracy are assigned to inform every citizen that
their new age will be inaugurated with blood. A people who are not a
proper part of the multicultural empire of laws must be wiped out in a
properly democratic fashion. Crowd-sourced genocide.And then the Grand Vizier ends up dangling from a rope, the tanks break through to Berlin, the chariots fall into the sea, the mustachioed dictator dies in a bedroom in Moscow his clothes soaked in his own urine-- and everything has gone completely wrong.
It's an old story and a new story. We tell it over and over again because it is always happening. It is our story and the story of the world. It is the story we have accepted from our parents and it is the story that we will pass on to our children. It is the story of the blood sacrifice of the New Age that goes wrong. The sacrifice survives, bloodied and scarred, the New Age goes down to ruin.
Once again we are the sacrifice to be slaughtered on the altar of the Arab Spring, of peace with the Muslim world, of a global age of global government for which only a few million people need to die. The knife is sharpened, the Grand Vizier and his aides smile, and the time is almost here. But it is not here yet. Now we sit down to hear the Megillah and remember how the story always ends.













30 comments:
As always, a startlingly clear view of reality, with no coddling about the horrors to come, but a powerful message of hope. Mr. Greenfield, why are you not running for office?
"The old Jews know what the New Age Jews do not, that history has not ended, that the past is still with us and that it has sharp teeth. They know that Man has not changed, that his sophistication is still only a shell and that sooner or later the shell cracks. If it does not crack from within, then it is cracked from without. While the New Age Jews sneer at the Holocaust obsession, Jews know that the past in all its awful terrors is a map and that forgetting it carries a terrible price."
Words that should be spoken at every Shoah memorial.
"Now we sit down to hear the Megillah and remember how the story always ends."
The Megillah and the Mordecai and Esther masks as a reminder of the past, present and future.
Keliata
Most Excellent Article, Relevant and Timeless, It is My Faith in a G-D I cannot see that reveals Truth to those who seek Him, He is still on His throne, and there is nothing new under the Sun. And Yes, There will be weeping and Knashing of Teeth. Keep up the good work Daniel.
I'm not sure that your categorization of Jews and New Age Jews works. What you call Jews are, in this era, better called Zionists -- Jews who believe that their salvation lies in their own efforts, or in God plus their own efforts, but not in God alone. Over the centuries, the Jews thought the route to survival (as a people, not always as individuals) was to bend, so as not to break. They thought themselves too powerless to fight back, other than in those unusual circumstances when God created conditions such as those at the end of the Megillah. Haman loses his balance and lands on Esther's bed just as the king walks into the room -- and the rest is history.
The ultra-Orthodox response to the Holocaust shows that the Jews and the New Age Jews aren't that different after all. They both pray for hope and change, and they both want the czar to smile on them, even though they both know that the difference between a smile and a snarl is not in their hands.
There's a Second Amendment lesson in the story of Purim as well; In America we are blessed with the freedom to defend ourselves without begging permission from the government. It is not a freedom we should take lightly or rush to surrender.
Israel is in a similar position internationally- much of the world believes that she should go begging to Kings of the World for permission to fight back when attacked.
Sultan, this is another absolutely wonderful column. Thank you!
Respectfully yours,
Lightbringer
Every single human being must make the choice, life versus death. If you love life, you choose
the life nourishing values of freedom and individual rights.
If you love death, there are all kinds of groups to join, read to hide out in, because you are too cowardly to face life on your own.
Groups that revel in slavery and death, like the Nazis, the Communists, the Islamics, will welcome you to the mindless anonymity of their vicious murdering hordes and remove that burden you find so heavy, thinking for yourself.
All you give up is your integrity, your sense of self worth, and your humanity in the real sense of being human.
So by all means celebrate Purim and life as your standard of value.
Given the seriousness of this article I must still give a hearty Chag Sameach!
I am glad you are alive Daniel and that so many Jews are. Please find time to celebrate and rejoice as you are able but as always, be vigilant and keep all of us aware as only you can.
Keliata
I'm not sure if it is true but I recall reading once that when Israeli citizens are inducted into the IDF they receive a bible and a weapon. True or not it's something important to ponder.
Keliata
Eric--I agree with you on the Secondment Amendment. I don't know if you consider the Amendments in ascending or descending order if one can even be ranked as more important than the other but IMO the First and Second are intertwined.
The First Amendment is first IMO for good reason. It protects our right to think and speak freely and express those beliefs in whatever forum we chose. The right of assembly, the freedom of religion.
Those rights can be dissolved, chipped away at so easily, especially the rights to think (which is why enslaved black Americans were not allowed to read under penalty of death).
A thinking person is a dangerous person in the eyes of a dictator or a regime along those lines.
History has proven that the only option for fighting for this fundemental right is force.
The Secondment Amendment keeps that option available for us. Not only to protect our homes but our very lives.
Sometimes force is the only way to fight force.
Keliata
Pet peeve but,Purims not a chag.
Thank you, Daniel, for laying your ancient heart upon the altar of history.
As the story of Esther, this article must be retold every year. Daniel, it remains as one of your best.
Purim Sameyach, Daniel - you're dead right, as usual, remember at that time, and 70 years previously where Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah were also forced into the multiculturalism of their day and overcame - miracles seemed 'just a distant story', 70ish years later at the casting of the lots, but the few who remembered made a difference in waking those who succumbed to multiculturalism and celebrating diversity and its lie.
As you state, people don't change, the few, in Purim's case, just 2 people made a great difference and even people chose Ha Shem from this victory.
I believe, Hannukah and Purim is how it all ends in the timeframe of the Chaggim.
In the meantime, we can all do little things which make a big difference e.g challenge everything, especially what your kids are learning, don't just moan about it, talk to the teacher, give evidence of the real history: mis-information smacks of National Socialist propaganda.
We should all be challenging the term "Palestinian" and demand to make them state what is on their passports - this will be someone's job soon to change all those country of origin on passports from "Jordanian" and "Egyptian" to the lie, "Palestinian".
As you enjoy your wine, remember the sweet stuff, Palwins, it means Palestinian Wine, which has been exported from Carmel since the late 1880s, well before the term "Palestinian" was used for an Arab circ 1970s kate b
In my mind, I've started this comment several times, and then scrubbed it. I don't know what to say.
The abiding truth triumphs over the melancholy. The history of the Jews is a history for all men and those peoples that love God will outlast tyranny.
churchill
oops an sorry Nachman...everyone
scratch that
keliata
That moment when you decide to read a bunch of other posts on this site after having read any one of them, because you're convinced something this brilliant has to be a one hit wonder.
You have a gift Daniel.
Thank you for sharing it.
This is the most overwrought and pretentious piece of writing I have read in months. For the love of god, "A force that breaks apart the towers of history, that saves us when we should have died, that has entrusted us with a mission. It reminds us of what the world is and reminds us of Itself and of what we are." What the hell does that even mean? It's eloquent, poetic even, but so vague as to be utterly free of content.
Your thesis seems to be "Because a bunch of awful stuff happened to Jews over the course of history, Zionists and Israel should be allowed to be as brutal as they need to be. Also, Obama is Hamen is Hitler is Stalin, or something?" (Hell, that sums up the whole thing, doesn't it? I could be your editor!) As if every group and nationality's history isn't filled with outrages. Do Native Americans get to rise up and kick us out now? How about the Poles? Historically, they haven't been treated very well either. By your rule, do they get to massacre Russians? You're like Brecht crying out "embrace the butcher!" Except you, like he, would never have the bravery to take up the arms you so enthusiastically endorse. You would only write about it, poorly.
Your problem, and the problem with writers like you, is that you have no sense of scale or proportion. It isn't enough for you to disagree with someone, you create an image of them as the worst people imaginable. Raising the marginal income tax on high earners from 36% to 39% isn't just a disagreeable policy, it's tyranny! Being a liberal Jew means you are (by what you ineptly wrote above) a collaborator, in cahoots on the genocide of Jews!
In the name of all that is holy, hire an editor, and maybe try reading something or speaking with someone who disagrees with you. If you can do this without comparing the person to Hitler in a rambling, incoherent essay, then Mazal tov, you've made progress.
^Commie
1. That line is talking about G-d. And that the force of near-annihilation gets you to see the world clearly, and breaks down the illusions you have about it. Methinks your ability to think critically is free of content.
2. Israel is not brutal. They are fighting people that cut clitorises off of their little girls, and strap their little boys with guns and bombs to be a terrorist army. And rape people. And attack cars on the highway with rocks. And shoot innocent people. Brutality would be to destroy the countries they come from, like Egypt and Lebanon. Instead, they let them stay and walk over everyone, while giving them food, electricity and housing, and defend them to the death.
3. Obama, if listened to, such as his demands to return to suicide borders, would cause more death than Haman could have.
4. Native Americans are welcome to rise up and kick out small pox and alcohol. Those kill more than 90% of the native American population. With no immunity to small pox, it's a wonder that any survived.
5. The Poles are no longer under Soviet domination. When the Soviets were ruining their country and controlling their lives, it would have been a momentous blessing to humanity if they had.
6. He never advocated killing the Arabs, though I personally tend to favor it over expulsion, because they will without a shadow of a doubt do everything to create a new holocaust no matter where they are.
7. There Arabs were not there first. Historically, obviously the land belongs to the Jews. It is the Jewish homeland, and after they were kicked out, they still managed to maintain a steady population, which was regularly wiped out by Arabs and crusaders. In the 1800s, Jews starting coming in the masses, and there was nothing there. The Arabs that might be found there were nomadas that moved through the desert, and didn't much care or Israel or many other borders, they simply moved from place to place. There was no steady Arab population. The Jews created economic opportunities, and despite the league of nations proposal to create a JEWISH homeland in modern Israel AND "Jordan", the British wanted to suck up to their Arab friends, and gave them Jordan, while allowing massive illegal Arab immigration into the land of Israel, and keeping Jews from entering. This also happened during the holocaust. The Arab illegal immigrants today call themselves "Palestinians" because what better way to wipe out a race (and they have absolutely no hang-ups about saying that that is exactly what they want to do) then to create a race that's supposed to replace it? So long as the actual race exists, the other race can say it is being oppressed, since the other exists and stole their land and identity, which is why they should be wiped out
8. Daniel Greenfield is a better writer than you could hope any one of your great grandchildren to be in a thousand generations.
9. Stop making straw men arguments. The income tax hikes proposed by Barack Hussein Osama were much higher, and the purpose is redistribution to those that don't work, encouraging them not to work, and making them dependent on the government, while crippling the workers and encouraging them to do the same, until they are dependent on the government as well. Things have consequences. If you are unable to see past tomorrow, that's your problem, but keep your tiny brain and giant mouth away from those that are.
10. Daniel Greenfiel is a phenomenal writer. The fact that you don't notice that is the greatest point that everything you say is clueless, though anything you say serves the same purpose.
11. Liberal Jews aren't necessarily traitors, many are just immoral and only hurt themselves. If they vote for Barack Hussein Osama, then they are.
12. Don't pretend you know of anything holy.
13. This blog is better written and more factual than the New York times. No one has mentioned Hitler but you, and we're Jews here, and don't want to think about that creature (YSV). Shame on you. Please hire an editor who is familiar with the "backspace" button for yourself.
Well, first of all, you said:
"He never advocated killing the Arabs, though I personally tend to favor it over expulsion,"
Wow.
Secondly you, well, everybody really, should read this:
http://www.juliansanchez.com/2010/03/26/frum-cocktail-parties-and-the-threat-of-doubt/
I mean, I doubt you will read it, but I thought I should offer.
There Arabs were not there first. No the Caananites were there first.
Your article: Conservatives are the same as liberal elites, and both read the New York times. They just are the ones that hate their opponents, and read from less newsources.
I've never seen anything so narrow-minded and shallow. The problem with liberals is they always seem to respond to the arguments they make about conservatives, instead of their arguments. What a retard. Going from reading this to that is like reading a high school play after a Greek or French epic.
And yes, the Caananites were there first. If their child sacrificing murderous society was still around today, the world would look a lot more like hell. Imagine Saudi Arabia, but everywhere. Their deaths saved millions, and ensured the planet would advance instead of being stuck in vile violent idolatrous traditions.
Regardless, the one true G-d gave us that land and it's ours. Try your best not to scoff at that; historically, it's not a really good idea.
*idea to do
Also, anonymous coward, please don't confuse republicans with conservatives. Chris Christie, I'm certain, attends all the cocktail parties possible, but he's as conservative as John Mccain or Bush Sr., which is not conservative.
Lastly (BTW, after your "firstly", what's secondly, I made 13 points, and you have 1) denounce the Arabs for saying they want to exterminate the Jews before you denounce me, they started it, and I'm only making the sane response. If that's what they want, what do you suppose will change their mind? Indoor toilets?
My,My, How amusing, when "Truth" ruffles the feathers of "Unbelievers". Yes, there is a G-D,
A "Creator", Who says, "All Your (MAN) Wisdom is Foolishness". How Humbling,irreconcillable to the Liberal who fancies themselves "Educated".
Gotta hand it to You Daniel. Thanks Again.
This is absolutely succinct and revelatory but why is it only so to the people and not obvious to Western Governments around the world. Keep up the excellent work.
Soi Dog
Post a Comment